How the Next Generation Can Add Value to ESG Investing
Young investors – passionate about sustainability and business ethics – are exploring at the intersection of social impact and investing. You want the money that you invest in companies to not just make a profit, but also achieve a purpose. This includes everything from addressing the climate crisis, to supporting the careers of women and minorities in business.
An example of “Gen Z’s unique way of reforming business is through investing,” notes Raymond L., a high school student who participated this summer in our Comment & Win contest. “Investors will begin to shoulder the responsibility to solve social and environmental problems. As an impact investor, I will always be on the lookout to spot ‘good’ companies and find new ways to promote this type of investing through my generation.”
Environmental, Social, Governance
ESG is one approach that investors are using to spot those good companies – and invest sustainably in financially strong prospects. Every year, it is a popular acronym and approach among the teams that participate in our Wharton Global High School Investment Competition.
ESG refers to the environmental, social and corporate governance practices of an investment. Looking at companies through an ESG lens, rating companies use data to score company performance around certain metrics, like a company’s concern for the community, environmental impact, and how well its leadership performs. When selecting stocks, investors integrate ESG factors to improve their traditional financial analysis of potential investments and to identify risks and opportunities. It is part of the risk management that can be essential to sound investing.
“There is little evidence that any of this huge fund inflow is improving financial or societal returns to date. This is a huge risk.”— Witold Henisz, Founder, Wharton’s ESG Analytics Lab
Different from socially responsible investing, where investors favor companies that are engaged in intentionally good acts like developing a technology that cleans plastic waste from the oceans, ESG screening rates all types of companies on how they measure up on various factors. And while there is an overlay of social consciousness, the main objective of ESG valuation remains financial performance – investments that will generate returns.
“The idea is to look at companies and to evaluate them on their ESG performance,” says Katherine Klein, vice dean of the Wharton Social Impact Initiative. “What is their environmental performance? Are they polluting? Is there good diversity in gender and race on the board of directors? Governance has to do with how this company is governed by the board of directors. How many independent board members are there? How much control and oversight is there outside the company? The emerging evidence on ESG suggests that at least in some cases, it’s a good way to evaluate risk.” (For a comprehensive discussion of everything ESG that breaks down Environmental, Social and Governance into easy-to-understand lessons, visit our Explore Business mini-sites for high school students.)
Witold Henisz, Wharton professor of management, director of the Wharton Political Risk Lab, and the founder of the ESG Analytics Lab, notes that ESG investing takes different forms.
“ESG investing incorporates or takes into account ESG factors in some manner. This could include screening out low-performing companies on ESG, tilting away from low and/or towards high-performing companies, or investing in companies that have been underperforming on ESG (and financial returns), but seem poised (or could be prodded) to improve.”
Henisz believes ESG can generate value within companies, with big potential to deliver value to investors, the environment and society. What’s been missing is solid research on the effectiveness of ESG measures.
Portfolios with Values and Value
Wharton started the ESG Analytics Lab in 2019 because “there is so much interest in harnessing the power of capital to ‘fix capitalism,’ but so little hard-edged data analysis of what works and why,” notes Henisz. ESG Analytics generates rigorous but practically relevant analysis on the financial importance of ESG factors. The latest research, due out this month, introduces a new metric for assessing a firm’s ESG performance that has a more rigorous academic theory behind it and stronger connections to stock market value as compared to other measures. Other recent analysis looks at how widely ESG impacts can differ across industries.
The buzz around ESG is driven in large part, Henisz observes, by younger generations wanting a portfolio whose “values appreciate as much as its value.” However, the cautionary tale for investors is that a lot of the ESG hubbub is still hype.
“Most of the ESG offerings are simple greenwash,” says Henisz, adding that certain index funds might be called ESG for marketing purposes as a way to take advantage of investor demand. “There is little evidence that any of this huge fund inflow is improving financial or societal returns to date. This is a huge risk. If we don’t demonstrate impact on returns…the entire boom could be followed by a bust,” which would waste precious time in advancing ESG investing to benefit society.
The world’s youth, already intrigued with Environmental, Social and Governance factors, have an opportunity to strengthen the impacts of and case for ESG by connecting that emerging “hard-edged data analysis” with ESG’s financial and societal goals. “At present, interest far surpasses rigor, which is an invitation to bright, young, interested minds to help reality catch up to the rhetoric,” says Professor Henisz of the ESG landscape. “Be that entrepreneur, not just because it will generate alpha [investment returns] or because it will address climate change, but because of both and how important it is to convince people that’s possible.”
Conversation Starters
What is ESG?
Why does Professor Witold Henisz say that ESG is largely hype? What needs to happen for that to change?
Are you interested in ESG? Share your story in the comment section of this article.
ESG, a financial metric pioneered by BlackRock’s Larry Fink, is typically used to gauge a company’s long-term environmental, social, and governance risks. Every company is assigned an ESG score by companies such as Sustainalytics, MSCI, etc; companies with higher ESG scores are called “green stocks,” and companies with relatively lower ESG scores are known as “brown stocks.”
Quite recently, analysts found a significant correlation between a stock’s greenness and average return. Over the past few years, the top sustainable funds, as ranked by Sustainalytics, have vastly outperformed the rest of the stock market! In fact, recent data shows that more than $4 out of every $10 is invested into ESG.
As for ESG’s practicality, it carries little to no risk. In a study recently published by Wharton Professors Lubos Pastor and Robert F. Stambaugh, it was evident that green stocks have lower expected returns but higher realized returns than brown assets. Interestingly enough, there is an inverse relationship between realized returns and expected returns, thus establishing how different green stocks are from brown stocks in terms of long-term performance, risk, etc. Moreover, this correlation clearly elucidates that value stocks are mainly brown and that growth stocks are mainly green.
Thank you for your comment, Rishab, I found it enlightening on the profitability of ESG investing, which the article did not discuss in vivid detail. I found it interesting that green stocks tended to be growth stocks. Perhaps this is a sign that high-growth companies have achieved their high growth due to possessing above-average ESG scores. Personally, when competing in a stock market game, I short-sold companies with low ESG scores and poor performance. I invested in companies like Plug Power, in the high ESG scoring renewable energy sector, with considerable success. I believe that ESG investing is viable as companies that improve our world have a competitive advantage compared to companies that do not, such as those that are classified as brown stocks. This competitive advantage stems from the fact that a business that enriches society is a business that will endure for the foreseeable future due to its high ROI. Overall, ESG investing will enhance our bank accounts while enhancing our world.
Contemplating how to structure my comment for Diana Drake’s article pertaining to ESG investing, I stopped at the local grocery store to buy some fruits and vegetables. While driving back home, I could not help but notice the golden arches of a local Mcdonald’s out of the corner of my eye. The sight spurred an idea as to how I can impact the world as a consumer. Despite not investing yet, in the traditional sense through the stock market, I believe I have an impact on companies as a consumer in a demand-driven economy. For example, as a consumer, I choose to consume healthier foods that have better consequences for the environment by being harvested using sustainable practices. I consciously decide to not eat at fast-food establishments, like the Mcdonald’s I passed, because they have a problematic impact on the world due to poor health and environmental conditions. My way of “sticking it” to fast-food conglomerates is opting out of buying any of their products and spreading the message of health. The ESG rating system, as outlined in the article, is a good start to holding businesses accountable. However, consumers’ choices are predominantly the force that allows certain companies to continue to operate. The US demand economy implies that the individual has the power to support certain businesses and make them better. Despite ESG pertaining to companies, we as consumers ought to hold ourselves accountable as well for the dollar decisions we make each day.
Appreciate your points here! ESG is more than an investing lens — it is a mindset that companies are embracing. The “S” in ESG, is really about the people a business impacts, including employees, customers and community. If you’re interested in the broader scope of ESG, please visit Global Youth’s ESG mini-sites. This one, in particular, talks about the human side of ESG: https://globalyouth.wharton.upenn.edu/resources-for-educators/explore-business/esg/humanizing-esg/.
Thanks, Diana, for sharing the mini-site.
I’ve been reading through the articles you provided, and they’ve offered valuable perspectives. The exploration of different innovations and ideas from other commenters have been particularly thought-provoking. As someone interested in the intersection of sustainability and its economic and market impacts, I found the S-factor especially informative.
In one of the videos Andrew Plepler (Bank Of America, ESG Leader) says, “Employee satisfaction is a real driver of the success of companies these days. The first question investors ask us is about our workforce and how we treat our own people.” He points out how Bank of America is taking steps to address this such as Enhanced Benefits and Compensation, Support for Work-Life Balance, and Focus on Diversity and Inclusion.
As a Gen Z student, I can confidently say my generation prioritizes incorporating environmental responsibility and social awareness. There’s always something to advocate for, challenge, or improve. While I agree with Pleper, there could be more personalized practices (especially as Gen Z becomes more prominent in the workforce) to address the S-factor.
1. My dad once was discussing how Ernst & Young is using AI during their first-round recruiting process. Something along those lines, we could develop personalized career development plans using AI. Implement an AI-driven platform that creates personalized career development plans for employees based on their skills, interests, and performance data. This tool could suggest relevant training, mentorship opportunities, and potential career paths within the organization, helping employees feel more engaged and valued as well as catalyzing future career success.
2. Skill Exchange Program: Create a skill exchange program where employees can teach and learn new skills from one another. This could be anything from coding to cooking to public speaking. It promotes collaboration, cross-functional knowledge sharing, and personal growth, fostering a more connected and dynamic workplace culture.
3. Employee Innovation Lab: Establish an Innovation Lab where employees can pitch and develop their own projects or business ideas related to the company’s goals. Provide funding, resources, and mentorship for the best ideas, and allow employees to lead these projects, giving them a sense of ownership and creative freedom.
While Bank of America has made commendable strides in enhancing employee satisfaction through initiatives there is always room for further innovation. As the workforce evolves, particularly with the influx of Gen Z professionals, it’s crucial to explore new, personalized approaches. These above-listed initiatives could not only align with the company’s goals but also empower employees to grow, collaborate, and contribute in meaningful ways. I think these also align with Andrew Pepler’s quote that employee satisfaction is a real driver of the success of companies these days.