The Low-carbon Economy Is a High Global Priority

by Diana Drake

Zhiyan Yu, 17, has a deep passion. She’s a tireless champion of the low-carbon economy, which is an economy based on low-carbon power sources that don’t release carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the air. A student at Guangdong Experimental High School in China, Yu first discovered the low-carbon economy while attending a Model UN event in 2016. Immediately, she was hooked. She and a team of other students started a low-carbon economy institute to generate interest among their classmates, soon spreading the word through a national business summit that Yu attended as a member of her school’s business club. And since then, she says that she has raised 70,000 yuan (about $10,000 USD) through crowdfunding to start the Beijing Chimaira New Energy Co.

“In the past two years, we have focused on spreading the idea of the low-carbon economy to high school and undergraduate students. And now we are searching for solar energy projects for the business,” notes Yu, who traveled to Washington, D.C. this June to attend the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Global Energy Conference. “We have studied everything from the pioneering background of low-carbon economics to the low-carbon economic model, from the learning of environmental technology to how to estimate carbon emissions.”

Yu’s dedication to low-carbon economics is nothing if not timely. Countries around the world are focused on the threat of global climate change and how to achieve a low-carbon economy, while also taking advantage of the innovation needed to build and implement new energy technologies and strategies. Of course, they are thinking of the health of the planet. And there is also money to be made. The Global Commission on the Economy and the Climate announced in a recent study that action on climate change could contribute an extra $26 trillion to the world economy by 2030 and generate more than 65 million new low-carbon jobs by the same year.

The 2018 Global Climate Action Summit held this week in San Francisco, Calif., is expected to be a “launchpad for deeper worldwide commitments and accelerated action from countries — supported by all sectors of society — that can put the globe on track to prevent dangerous climate change.”

With all this in mind, here are five truths about the low-carbon economy:

  1. Feeling Energized. We all require energy to function, which we get from resources such as fossil fuels (coal or gas), nuclear fuel or renewable althernative forms of energy. This energy generates power for cars, lights, machines, cell phones, literally everything that keeps society moving, living and producing. The fact that energy is so fundamental to society’s survival leads to great opportunities for exploring how related goods and services are produced and consumed and how governments are forced to choose better policies.
  1. Low-carbon Clarity. A low-carbon economy has a minimal output of greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxides), which have been scientifically linked to cause climate change. Climate change refers to the changing weather, including patterns of temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind and seasons. According to the science behind it, climate patterns play an important role in shaping natural ecosystems and the human economies and cultures that depend on them. Reports like Washington State’s “Preparing for a Changing Climate” note that rising levels of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (think the exhaust emitted by vehicles and factories) have warmed the earth and are causing significant problems like rising sea levels and more extreme storms. Yu has her own definition of the low-carbon economy: “The low-carbon economy is a pathway that leads to technology development, business and employment, and better living quality by less consumption of natural resources and pollution,” she says. “The essence of a low-carbon economy is the promotion of technology efficiency, low-carbon products facing the public, and sustainable global development. In short, while countries are developing, industries are more environmentally friendly.”
  1. A Shift In Power. In the low-carbon economy of the future, most of our energy is likely to come from wind and solar power, also known as renewable energy. In order for a true renewable energy revolution, governments need to cap fossil fuel emissions – designate a level above which emissions can’t exceed. The oil industry opposes this move, but experts believe such drastic measures will lead to more green innovations and emissions-abatement technologies. Many countries are on a roll when it comes to producing their energy from renewables, with Denmark and Germany among the most aggressive. According to the 2018 Sustainable Energy in America Factbook, 18% of all electricity in the U.S. was produced by renewable sources in 2017, including solar, wind, and hydroelectric dams, up from 15% in 2016. China, despite many challenges, is the world’s leading source of renewable investment, as well as the largest solar manufacturer. Its renewable energy sector is reportedly growing faster than its nuclear energy and fossil fuel sectors. Yu is cautiously optimistic about the move toward a low-carbon economy in her country. “Although China’s main GDP [Gross Domestic Product] comes from industrial development, it is still moving toward a low-carbon economy structure step by step. But the low-carbon economy is not just an economic and commercial issue, it is also a social issue. China’s low carbon is not just a simple economic system about energy, environment, and business. It needs industry transformation, promotion of technology efficiency, and adoption for people’s living habits.”
  1. Taxing Choices. Standing in the way of a low-carbon future is the relatively high cost of financing utility-scale renewables, which makes them uncompetitive with fossil fuel power. One answer is to drive up the cost of fossil fuels with a politically difficult carbon tax (which charges a fee on the production, distribution or use of fossil fuels based on how much carbon the combustion emits) or indirectly through cap-and-trade mechanisms. The practice of taxing traditional fossil fuels is designed to promote wind, solar and other renewables and therefore decrease pollution. Yu points out that China does not currently have a carbon tax, adding that the country has only seven carbon trading market experimental cities, which means that most cities in China do not need to pay taxes or purchase carbon-emission permits. Some industry watchers have said that a so-called carbon tax may not be the best solution for a greener planet. Recent research from Serguei Netessine, a Wharton professor of operations, information and decisions, suggests that creating industrial-scale ways to store renewable energy may be a better way to go so you don’t have to rely on large amounts of carbon-emitting energy sources when, for instance, the sun goes down and solar energy is less accessible.
  1. Carbon Footprints. Many companies are finding ways to reduce their carbon footprints, that is to say, the amount of carbon dioxides and other compounds that they release into the environment through the use of fossil fuels. During this week’s 2018 Global Climate Action Summit in San Francisco, Lyft, the on-demand transportation company, announced that it has purchased enough carbon offsets to become a fully carbon-neutral company. A carbon offset is a reduction of carbon dioxide or other carbon emission made in one place to compensate for an emission made somewhere else. Lyft is also committing to purchase enough renewable energy to cover the electricity consumption of every Lyft office space, driver hub and electric vehicle mile. In its blog, Lyft writes, “As world leaders convene in San Francisco to address the urgent threat of climate change, we’re doubling down on our climate and clean energy commitments. And in the months and years ahead, we look forward to working with public and private partners to drive carbon out of the transportation system.”

Ultimately, Zhiyan Yu has learned — through her low-carbon economy work — that it’s important for people to understand the environment fully, along with its importance to society and economic growth. “I have seen many people trying to change people’s ideas and promote the importance and urgency of environmental protection,” she says. “But most people don’t understand why they must protect the environment. They think that climate change has little effect on their own daily lives. If I only get people’s sympathy from the topic that polar bears don’t have homes caused by global warming, it is not enough. [I need to] inform people how promotion of a low-carbon economy can lead to both development of GDP and environmental protection. And thus, people will pay more attention to the environment because it will help them financially.”

She adds that she does feel a sense of responsibility as a teenager invested in the future of her country and the world, and she encourages others to recognize their role as changemakers. “I hope that high school students can shoulder the responsibility of advancing a low-carbon economy in their communities and countries, so that everyone knows that developing a low-carbon economy will not only protect the environment, but also benefit society and its economic development. ”

Zhiyan Yu visited Peking University this year to attend a lecture by Wharton Dean, Geoffrey Garrett.
Zhiyan Yu visited Peking University this year to attend a lecture by Wharton Dean, Geoffrey Garrett.

Related Links

Conversation Starters

What is the low-carbon economy?

Lyft is one example of how a company is making deep commitments to the low-carbon economy. What are some other examples?

Using the “Related Links” to the right of this article, research the 2018 Global Climate Action Summit. What did you learn about how the world is addressing climate change and fueling the low-carbon economy? Share your new insights with a partner or in a group.

One comment on “The Low-carbon Economy Is a High Global Priority

  1. I think Diana’s insightful article has inspired me to dig further into the areas in which a low-carbon economy is feasible. One aspect that has especially intrigued me is the area of nuclear power. I think that in terms of moving towards a stronger long-term goal, when we are able to push nuclear technology, then it can create a better transition from fossil fuels both economically and politically. First of all, the idea of using renewable energy sources is not novel, but there are a few issues surrounding their implementation. According to the International Energy Agency, renewables will only be able to meet half the projected increase in global electricity demand over the next two years. The reason for this is that in many areas, there are large periods throughout the days, weeks, months, and years when renewable energy can’t fulfill the energy needs of any given population. Second of all, even with the sufficient amount of energy, studies have shown that we are at least half a century away from gaining the full power of the batteries, which means it is impossible to store it through the batteries for increasingly extended periods of windless and rainless days.
    Thirdly, renewables can only be used in limited places. Even if both of the first two issues are solved, we see that renewables clearly cannot provide the same transferable and sustainable energy sources over long periods of time from an oversupplied area to an undersupplied area. You can’t just move the sun or the wind to an area. However, nuclear power creates the best of both worlds in two major ways:
    First of all, nuclear power can guarantee renewable and stable supply for countries that are lacking. For example, over 70% of France’s power comes from nuclear power.
    Second of all, nuclear power is one of the least carbon-intensive energy sources in the world.
    The impact of this is that nuclear power is able to have the same impact as renewable energy for the same cost.
    We then, therefore, help the most vulnerable groups against climate change while still dealing with the energy crisis effectively.
    I think this will be vastly helpful in forging a path towards an environmentally friendly community while also not putting such heavy reliance on renewables that are still developing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *